According to the 2024 State of DevOps Report, 73% of high-performing engineering teams cite tool integration as a critical factor in their productivity. Yet many GitHub-based teams find themselves constantly switching between their code repository and project management platforms like Asana, losing an average of 4.2 hours per week to context switching and manual updates.

The friction is real: developers update code in GitHub, then manually copy progress to Asana. Project managers track tasks in Asana but lack visibility into actual development activity. This disconnect between GitHub project management and traditional task tracking creates duplicate work, outdated information, and frustrated teams struggling to maintain their DevOps workflow.

This comprehensive guide examines nine purpose-built alternatives that integrate deeply with repositories, pull requests, and continuous delivery pipelines. We'll explore tools that eliminate context switching, automate status updates, and provide Agile sprint analytics directly connected to your codebase.

Why GitHub-centric teams outgrow Asana

Engineering workflows fundamentally differ from general project management. While marketing teams might track campaign deliverables and design teams manage creative assets, software development revolves around code commits, pull requests, and deployment pipelines.

A 2023 LinearB study found that engineering teams using disconnected project management tools experienced 31% more missed deadlines compared to those using integrated solutions. Engineers reported spending up to 2 hours daily updating project status across multiple platforms, time that could be spent writing code.

"We were constantly playing telephone between GitHub and Asana," explains Sarah Chen, VP of Engineering at a 200-person fintech startup. "Our developers would merge PRs, but project managers wouldn't know until the weekly standup. By then, blockers had already cascaded into delays."

The outcome? Teams face decreased velocity, duplicated effort, and increased security risks from manually copying sensitive information between platforms. When your project management tool doesn't understand your development workflow, every update becomes a manual chore that interrupts flow state and delays delivery.

Pain points unique to code-focused projects

Software teams face distinct challenges that general-purpose project management tools weren't designed to handle.

Continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) status visibility

CI/CD represents the automated process of building, testing, and deploying code on every change. Modern engineering teams rely on these pipelines to ship features quickly and safely. However, when your project management tool can't see pipeline status, you're blind to critical information. A feature might appear "complete" in Asana while builds are failing in GitHub Actions.

Cross-repo dependency tracking

Enterprise projects often span multiple repositories. A single feature might require changes to the frontend repo, backend API, and mobile app. Traditional project management tools treat these as separate tasks, missing the intricate web of dependencies that determine whether a feature can actually ship.

PR review bottlenecks vs. task checklists

While Asana excels at simple task checklists, it doesn't understand the nuanced workflow of code review. A pull request might sit for days awaiting review, blocking an entire feature. Without visibility into PR status, review assignments, and merge conflicts, project managers can't identify and resolve bottlenecks before they impact deadlines.

Limitations in GitHub integration and automation

Asana's GitHub integration, while functional, falls short of what engineering teams need. The connection relies on manual linking between Asana tasks and GitHub issues or PRs. There's no native webhook support or GitHub Actions triggers to automatically update task status when code ships.

Teams report spending 15-20 minutes per developer daily on manual status updates. For a 10-person engineering team, that's over 16 hours weekly lost to administrative overhead. More critically, these manual updates often lag behind actual progress, leaving stakeholders with outdated information when making critical decisions.

The lack of commit referencing means developers can't naturally update tasks through their normal workflow. Instead of simply mentioning a task ID in a commit message, they must switch contexts, load Asana, find the task, and manually update it. This friction leads to poor adoption and stale project data.

How to evaluate Asana alternatives for GitHub workflows

Selecting the right tool requires a systematic evaluation approach. Consider creating a scoring matrix with these criteria:

Run hands-on trials using a sample repository and sprint backlog. Key evaluation points include how quickly the tool syncs GitHub activity, whether developers can work entirely within their preferred environment, and how accurately the tool reflects your actual development workflow.

Native GitHub issue and PR linkage

True native integration means more than surface-level connections. Look for tools that offer one-click conversion of issues to PRs, allowing developers to seamlessly move from planning to implementation.

Bi-directional sync ensures changes in either system update the other instantly. When a developer closes a PR, the associated task should automatically update. When a project manager adjusts a deadline, developers should see it in their GitHub notifications.

The most sophisticated integrations mirror PR comments directly in task discussions, creating a single source of truth for technical and project conversations. This eliminates the "where was that decided?" confusion that plagues distributed teams.

Agile boards, epics, and sprint analytics

Modern software development relies on Agile methodologies to deliver value iteratively. Your project management tool must support:

Kanban/Scrum board customization: Teams need flexibility to model their unique workflows, from simple "To Do/In Progress/Done" to complex multi-stage pipelines with QA, staging, and production deployments.

Epic hierarchy: Epics represent large bodies of work broken down into smaller user stories or tasks across sprints. Tools should maintain clear parent-child relationships and roll up progress automatically.

Sprint analytics: Velocity measures story points completed per sprint. Burndown charts show remaining work against time. Cycle time tracks how long tasks take from start to finish. These metrics help teams improve their estimation and identify process bottlenecks.

Security, compliance, and hosting models

Enterprise teams face stringent security requirements. SOC 2 Type II certification provides third-party validation that a service provider maintains security controls over time, not just at a point in time. This ongoing audit covers security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.

Deployment flexibility matters too. Cloud solutions offer convenience but may not meet regulatory requirements. On-premises deployment provides complete control but requires infrastructure management. Hybrid models and single-tenant cloud options balance security with convenience.

Consider data residency requirements, especially for teams in regulated industries or specific geographic regions. GDPR compliance isn't just about privacy policies but also about where data is stored and how it's processed.

The 9 best Asana alternatives for GitHub teams

After extensive testing and analysis of user reviews, we've identified nine tools that excel at GitHub-centric project management. Here's a quick comparison before diving into detailed reviews:

Zenhub

Zenhub stands apart by living directly inside GitHub through a browser extension, eliminating context switching entirely. Unlike other tools that bolt on GitHub integration as an afterthought, Zenhub enhances GitHub's native interface with sophisticated project management capabilities.

Deep GitHub integration: The browser extension adds project management features directly to GitHub's UI. Developers see sprint information, story points, and dependencies without leaving their code review workflow. The GitHub App enables automated workflows triggered by repository events.

Agile toolkit: Multi-repository epics let teams track features spanning multiple codebases. Roadmaps visualize long-term planning while maintaining connection to actual development work. Velocity reports and burndown charts generate automatically from GitHub activity, ensuring metrics reflect reality rather than manual updates.

Unique value: By working where developers already are, Zenhub achieves adoption rates above 90% compared to the industry average of 60% for external project management tools. Teams report saving 6+ hours weekly on status updates and meetings.

Hosting & security: Cloud and on-premises options accommodate different security requirements. SOC 2 Type II certification provides enterprise-grade security assurance. The on-premises version offers complete data control for regulated industries.

Jira Software

Atlassian's Jira Software brings decades of project management expertise, though its GitHub integration requires configuration and often third-party apps.

Integration approach: Jira connects to GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket through marketplace apps. Smart commits allow developers to update issues through commit messages, though setup requires administrative configuration.

Advanced features: Sophisticated Scrum and Kanban boards support complex workflows. Advanced roadmapping tools help product managers plan across multiple teams and quarters. AI-powered features suggest sprint plans and forecast delivery dates based on historical velocity.

Scalability: Jira excels in large enterprises with complex approval workflows and compliance requirements. However, this power comes with a steep learning curve. New teams often spend weeks configuring workflows and training users.

Considerations: While Jira offers extensive features, the cost can escalate quickly with add-ons. Many GitHub integration features require paid marketplace apps, adding $5-10 per user monthly.

GitLab

GitLab takes a different approach by combining version control with project management in a single platform.

All-in-one platform: Built-in issue boards, milestones, and epics eliminate integration complexity. When code and project management share a database, updates happen instantly without synchronization delays.

DevOps focus: Native CI/CD pipelines connect directly to project milestones. Security scanning results feed into issue tracking. This tight integration provides unmatched visibility into the entire software delivery lifecycle.

Migration considerations: Teams must weigh the benefits against the cost of migrating repositories from GitHub. GitLab offers GitHub importers and mirroring capabilities, but maintaining two platforms adds complexity.

Deployment flexibility: Available as SaaS or self-hosted, GitLab provides options for any security requirement. The self-hosted version includes all features, unlike some competitors that limit functionality.

Linear

Linear emphasizes speed and simplicity, attracting teams frustrated with sluggish, overcomplicated tools.

Performance focus: The interface responds instantly to every action. Keyboard shortcuts for every function let power users fly through updates. The command palette provides quick access to any feature without hunting through menus.

GitHub synchronization: Issues sync bidirectionally with GitHub. PR status updates automatically move issues through workflow states. The integration feels native despite being a separate platform.

Opinionated design: Linear makes deliberate choices about how teams should work. While this reduces configuration overhead, teams with unique workflows may find it restrictive.

Enterprise readiness: Currently focused on startups and scale-ups, Linear lacks some enterprise features like advanced permissions and compliance certifications. However, rapid development suggests these gaps may close soon.

ClickUp

ClickUp positions itself as the "one app to replace them all," offering extensive customization for teams with diverse needs.

Flexibility: Multiple view types (List, Board, Gantt, Calendar) let different team members work how they prefer. Custom fields and statuses accommodate any workflow without forcing teams into a rigid structure.

GitHub integration: The native GitHub app enables basic synchronization. Automation rules can trigger actions based on GitHub events, though the integration lacks the depth of purpose-built developer tools.

Feature richness: From built-in documentation to time tracking and goal setting, ClickUp includes everything teams might need. This breadth can overwhelm teams seeking simple GitHub project management.

Performance: The extensive feature set can impact performance, especially for large teams. Loading times and occasional sync delays frustrate users accustomed to snappier tools.

Trello

Trello's visual simplicity makes it accessible to technical and non-technical team members alike.

Kanban simplicity: Drag-and-drop cards provide an intuitive way to track work. The visual nature helps in daily standups and sprint reviews where the whole team needs to understand status quickly.

Power-Up ecosystem: The GitHub Power-Up adds basic integration, showing PR status and linking cards to commits. However, functionality remains limited compared to purpose-built developer tools.

Scaling challenges: While perfect for small teams, Trello struggles with complex projects. The lack of built-in sprint management, velocity tracking, and advanced permissions limits its utility for growing engineering organizations.

Best use cases: Trello excels for hackathons, small projects, or teams transitioning to Agile. Its simplicity reduces barriers to adoption but may require migration to more robust tools as teams mature.

Shortcut

Formerly Clubhouse, Shortcut targets software teams specifically with a balance of power and simplicity.

Developer-centric design: Built by developers for developers, the interface reflects how software teams actually work. Stories connect naturally to epics and milestones without excessive hierarchy.

GitHub synchronization: Two-way sync keeps GitHub and Shortcut aligned. Automatic PR linking and status updates reduce manual work. The integration handles edge cases like PR reversions and force pushes gracefully.

Reporting depth: Cycle time analysis shows where work gets stuck. Velocity tracking accounts for story point inflation over time. These insights help teams continuously improve their processes.

Pricing advantage: Competitive pricing makes Shortcut accessible to bootstrapped startups. The free tier supports up to 10 users with full features, unusual in the project management space.

Ora

Ora brings visual project management to smaller development teams with budget constraints.

Hybrid approach: Combines Kanban boards with timeline and calendar views. This flexibility helps teams that work on both feature development and time-sensitive deployments.

GitHub integration: Import GitHub issues to jumpstart project setup. Basic synchronization keeps issues updated, though real-time sync can lag during high activity periods.

Time tracking: Built-in time tracking helps agencies and consultancies bill accurately. The integration with project tasks eliminates separate time-tracking tools.

Limitations: Smaller development team means fewer features and integrations compared to established players. Enterprise security certifications and advanced permissions remain on the roadmap.

Tuleap

Tuleap offers a comprehensive open-source Application Lifecycle Management platform for teams requiring complete control.

Open-source advantage: Full source code access allows customization for unique workflows. No vendor lock-in risk provides long-term security for critical projects.

Integrated modules: Beyond project management, Tuleap includes Git hosting, test management, and document handling. This integration particularly benefits regulated industries requiring full traceability.

Self-hosted control: Complete data sovereignty satisfies the strictest security requirements. Teams can audit every line of code and maintain air-gapped installations if needed.

Support considerations: While community support exists, teams need internal expertise or commercial support contracts. The setup and maintenance overhead may overwhelm smaller teams.

Choosing the right tool for your roadmap

The best tool depends on your team's specific context. Consider these primary factors:

Integration depth vs. flexibility: Purpose-built tools like Zenhub offer the deepest GitHub integration but less flexibility for non-development work. General tools like ClickUp provide flexibility but require more configuration for developer workflows.

Cost vs. compliance: Open-source solutions minimize licensing costs but require infrastructure investment. Cloud solutions offer convenience but may not meet regulatory requirements. Evaluate total cost of ownership, not just license fees.

Cloud vs. on-premises: Cloud deployment provides immediate value but requires trusting a vendor with your data. On-premises deployment offers control but demands IT resources. Consider hybrid options for balanced risk.

Start with a pilot project involving your most demanding developers and project managers. Their feedback will reveal whether a tool truly fits your workflow or just looks good in demos.

Mapping features to team size and maturity

Different team sizes and maturity levels require different tool capabilities:

Startups (1-10 developers): Prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Linear and Trello minimize setup time and training requirements. Focus on tools that won't slow down rapid iteration.

Growing teams (10-75 developers): Need sophisticated features like epic management and cross-team visibility. Zenhub and Shortcut balance power with usability. Investment in process and tooling pays dividends at this scale.

Enterprises (75+ developers): Demand compliance certifications, role-based permissions, and vendor stability. Zenhub, Jira, GitLab, and Tuleap provide enterprise-grade features. Integration with existing systems becomes critical.

Migration tips from Asana to GitHub-native tools

Switching from Asana to a GitHub-centric tool doesn’t have to be painful. A phased approach helps preserve project continuity while minimizing risk.

Step 1: Audit your current Asana projects

Review active projects, epics, and task hierarchies. Identify which tasks should be migrated and which can be archived. This is the time to clean up old tasks, resolve duplicates, and align on current priorities.

Step 2: Export tasks as CSV

Use Asana’s built-in export feature to generate a CSV file of your tasks. Include fields like task name, assignee, due date, tags, and custom fields.

Step 3: Map Asana fields to GitHub equivalents

Plan how fields from Asana translate into GitHub-native or third-party fields. For example:

• Asana task name → GitHub issue title
• Assignee → GitHub user
• Tags → Labels
• Project → Milestone or Epic

Step 4: Bulk import using the new platform

Some tools like Zenhub and Linear offer migration scripts or CSV importers that map fields automatically. Use these to bulk-create issues and epics in your new tool. Double-check for formatting errors, assignment mismatches, or missing metadata.

Run dual systems for one sprint

To avoid surprises, run Asana and the new system in parallel for one sprint. Compare the data side-by-side to validate issue status, assignees, and epics. This dry run helps teams catch data mismatches before fully switching over.

Leverage migration services

Several GitHub-native platforms offer partner services or custom scripts to simplify migration. Zenhub, for example, provides guided onboarding and import automation. If you're migrating hundreds or thousands of tasks, this can save significant time and reduce manual cleanup.

Cost and licensing considerations

Pricing models vary widely between Asana alternatives. What looks affordable on paper can quickly become expensive without careful evaluation.

Understand how pricing works

• Freemium: Most tools offer free tiers for small teams, but features may be limited.
• Per-user pricing: Common among SaaS tools like Jira, Zenhub, and Shortcut. Costs scale directly with team size.
• Flat-rate pricing: Some tools offer team-based pricing, which may be more predictable for larger organizations.

Watch out for hidden costs

• Required add-ons: Many integrations or enterprise features come at an additional monthly fee.
• Storage and usage limits: Some freemium tiers throttle usage or charge overage fees for storage, automation, or API calls.
• Training time: Complex tools like Jira often require onboarding sessions and internal documentation, especially for non-technical team members.

Discounts and special pricing

• Open-source projects: Tools like Zenhub and GitLab often offer discounted or free tiers for verified open-source maintainers.
• Non-profits and education: Many vendors extend reduced pricing or unlimited access to non-commercial organizations. Be sure to ask.

Frequently asked questions

How do I migrate tasks from Asana to GitHub issues?

Answer: Export tasks from Asana as a CSV, map columns to GitHub fields (title, assignee, labels), and import using GitHub’s CSV uploader or a migration script like Zenhub’s importer.

Which alternative offers the deepest GitHub API integration?

Answer: Zenhub embeds directly into GitHub’s UI and connects through the GitHub API, syncing issues, pull requests, and workflows in real time. It provides the most seamless experience for GitHub-centric teams.

Are there fully open-source options comparable to Asana?

Answer: Yes. Tuleap and OpenProject are self-hosted, open-source platforms that support Agile boards, backlog tracking, and Git integration, making them solid choices for teams prioritizing control and transparency.

Does GitHub itself have built-in project management now?

Answer: GitHub Projects (Beta) now includes kanban views, custom fields, and saved views. It’s ideal for lightweight task tracking, but it lacks advanced reporting, epic management, and sprint metrics found in full-featured tools.

What security certifications should I look for?

Answer: Look for SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications for cloud-hosted platforms. If you handle sensitive data, prioritize tools with GDPR or FedRAMP compliance, and ensure they offer on-prem or private cloud options if needed.

‍